1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. With respect to the case of application for the suspension of compulsory execution No. 2016 Chicago278, Oct. 1, 2016

1. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, the defendant applied for the seizure of each of the goods of this case in Gyeonggi-gun D Ground Building (hereinafter "the building of this case") based on the original copy of the judgment in the Seoul Central District Court case No. 2010Kadan4773 between himself and C (hereinafter "the building of this case"), and on October 6, 2016, the execution officer of the judgment of the Jung-gu District District Court to which the defendant was delegated to execute the execution (hereinafter "the execution of this case") was executing the seizure of each of the goods of this case located within the building of this case (hereinafter "the execution of this case").

2. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff leased the building of this case from C, and the owner of each of the goods of this case. Thus, the execution of the seizure of this case under the premise that each of the goods of this case is owned by C is unlawful.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff is the owner of each of the instant goods. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.