Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 24, 2018, the Defendant received 112 reports from a taxi engineer and a taxi engineer on the front of 206 building B in front of the racing on January 24, 2018, and dispatched to the site after receiving a 112 report from the taxi engineer and the police box affiliated with the police box of the racing police station, and received the taxi expenses.
Hayon Hayon Hayon Hayon,
도요 on a taxi;
“I want to hear the word “,” and take a bath, I am at one time at the right part of the above D’s right-hand cream.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of work log, etc.);
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the case where the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is minor (one month to eight months) in the mitigation area (one month and August), [the special mitigated person] in the event that the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties is minor (the decision of sentencing] below the following circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, conditions before and after the crime, etc.
Unfavorable circumstances: The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was able to take a bath and assault a police officer.
Police officers who have been assaulted wanted to punish the defendant.
The defendant recognizes all the facts of the crime.
There is no record of the same crime and no record of the fine or heavier.