(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.01.25 2017구합5546

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.01.25 2017구합5546

불합격처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant conducted the second test, a written essay-type written examination (hereinafter “the second test”), from August 2, 2016 to August 6, 2016, for the purpose of open competitive employment of national public officials of Grade V (technology), and the third test, an interviewee, from November 29, 2016 to November 30, 2016 (hereinafter “the third test”).

B. The Plaintiff applied for the above open competitive recruitment as occupational category of industry (general machinery) and completed the third examination of this case after undergoing the second examination of this case, but was subject to a disposition of failure to pass the examination on December 13, 2016 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On December 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on December 30, 2016, to the effect that there was an error in the marking criteria for the mechanical design issues No. 2 of the third text of the mechanical design subject (hereinafter “instant issue”), and that the Plaintiff changed the Plaintiff to the final successful applicant of the third examination, but was dismissed on July 11, 2017.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 through 3, testimony of witness B, and purport of whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a matter of seeking “the maximum response to Ghana”.

In order to solve these problems, it is correct to consider only the bath of bath, but the members of the second examination examination of this case should consider not only the bath of bath, but also the bath of bath of bath of bath.

The plaintiff, by the electronic method, failed to obtain points assigned to the issue of this case, and the plaintiff applied for the third examination of this case in the status of 11th grade (Preliminary 2) of the second examination of this case, but failed to overcome the differences in points.

The instant disposition is derived from the error of the grading criteria as above.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2020.09.24 2020재누10037

-대법원 2019.04.25 2018두48199

-대법원 2019. 4. 25. 선고 2018두48199 판결

-울산지방법원 2020.09.17 2019구합1122

-서울행정법원 2017.07.20 2017구합2080