beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year from Seoul High Court to imprisonment for robbery, injury, or aiding and abetting, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on July 30, 2013 by the Gansung Vocational Training Correctional Institution.
1. On October 11, 2014, at around 115:45, the Defendant: (a) operated a black 5 siren car in the direction of the Hannam-gu Seoul on the front side of the Gangnam-gu Seoul on the road; (b) was locked in the atmosphere of the signal.
At this time, the Inspector N and Assistant O, a police officer belonging to the Gangnam Police Station M, called "the driver has difficulty in passing through" after receiving 112 reports, and discovered the defendant who has been divingd during driving of the said vehicle at the three-lanes on the 6-lanes of the 6-lanes, and demanded the above N to leave the above NN on several occasions, but the defendant, without complying therewith, failed to comply with the above request, went to the direction of a new road route, while driving the aboveO's knee, knee and knife in the front of the right side of the said vehicle and driving the vehicle along the central line along the opposite lane.
Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted police officers who have been performing 112 reporting duties using cars that are dangerous objects, thereby hindering the legitimate performance of official duties.
2. The Defendant was required to undergo an inspection by a police officer as above at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above Paragraph (1) above, but at the time, the P on the top of the passenger car at that time stated that “the person was a fine,” and accordingly, the P on the top of the car at that time was “the person who was a fine.” As such, the Defendant failed to comply with the police officer’s request to avoid arresting the P on the ground that the summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million was finalized due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, but the P on the ground that the failure to pay a fine is likely to be dismissed, and the P on the ground that
As a result, the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.