The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: at around 14:37 January 6, 1996, the Defendant’s employees Gap loaded 11.40 tons of the B vehicle owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s work on the street in front of the crackdown on the fluoral fluor of the fluoral vehicle located in Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, and operated more than 10 tons of the limited fluoral load, and violated the road management authority’s restriction on the operation of the vehicle.

The prosecutor prosecuted the charged facts of this case by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005). The summary order of KRW 300,000 was notified in this court.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which is in violation of the Constitution (Supreme Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38 Decided October 28, 2010). The above provision of the law, which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, retroactively loses its effect.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.