logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.10 2016구단11073
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of disposition;

A. On August 15, 2015, the Plaintiff driven a B car at around 19:35, while driving the car at around 7-lane in front of the Southern-gu High-Tech located at the top of the 7-day high-tech in Gwangju Mine, it is not possible to look at the unfurine left, while failing to timely operate the brakes, and by negligence, the victim C, who stopped from the front direction of the Plaintiff’s moving route to the signal air, was driving at the front part of the said car, and caused the said franchise to treat the said 6-day high-tech in front of the said car, and caused the damage to the said 7-day high-speed passenger car to undergo an 2-day treatment for the victim to use the 3-day treatment for the above 2-day high-speed passenger car, and to use the 2-day treatment for the 2-day high-speed passenger car to undergo an analysis of the 2-day high-speed passenger car, and to use the 3-day treatment for the above 2-day high-tech.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s Class 1 ordinary driver’s license on the ground that “the Plaintiff caused the instant accident and did not take relief measures against the victim, etc.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal on December 28, 2015, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the claim on February 16, 2016.

【Ground of recognition” has no dispute, Gap's 1, 4, and Eul's 7.

arrow