logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.14 2017나61652
근저당권말소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or each of the statements in Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1 to 8, Gap evidence 6, 8, Gap evidence 15-6, Eul evidence 1, 2, and the whole purport of the arguments are reviewed.

On May 15, 2011, the Plaintiff and D’s husband, who are the Plaintiff’s representative and D’s husband (hereinafter “the deceased’s husband”) confirmed that the amount of KRW 1,070,000 (hereinafter “existing loans”) or the amount of KRW 1,000,000 as of May 25, 201 is 10,000 (hereinafter “existing loans”) or the amount of KRW 100,000 (hereinafter “new loans”) or 100,000,000, 100 or 100,000, 200,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 205,00 won and 205.

B. On behalf of the Plaintiff on May 25, 201, the Deceased prepared a monetary loan agreement with the Defendant to the effect that the Plaintiff borrowed 170,000,000 won from the Defendant as interest-free interest, 30% per annum for delay, and 15 August 201, the due date for payment, respectively, on behalf of the Plaintiff, and that a notary public entrusted the preparation of a notarial deed on the said monetary loan agreement to the law firm new paths, and that the said law firm was as the Plaintiff’s head under Article 201 of the 2011.

arrow