logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.05.21 2013고단413
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) A, an employee of the Defendant, operated B vehicle at a Gun mountain office located in the Seon-gun Office located in the Seon-gun Office located in the Don-do Office located in the 215.9km on February 28, 2002; (b) on April 6, 2002, at around 20:35, the Defendant violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating B vehicle at the 44.2km on February 28, 2002, and (c) on April 16, 2002, the Defendant violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the said vehicle at the 17 line located in the Dan-gun National Road located in the Dan-gun National Road located in the Dan-gun Office located in the Dan-gun National Road located in the Dan-gun Office, the total weight of which is 46.7t.

On the other hand, the prosecutor, applying Article 86, Article 83(1)2, Article 83(1)3, and Article 54(1) and (2) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the facts charged in this case, was prosecuted, and the summary order of KRW 2,00,00 was notified and finalized in this court.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," the part of the above Act provides that "if such agent, employee, or other servant of the corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," and Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if such agent, employee, or other servant of the corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 3 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation, the Constitutional Court shall be unconstitutional."

arrow