logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.04.25 2013고정1219
업무방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay a fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 26, 2012, around 08:50 on September 26, 2012, the Defendants, along with those who were present at a transportation fee increase-related assembly held by the cargo joint and several branch, were unable to know the names of the Defendants, and the victims D(50 years of age) who did not participate in the strike was tightly left.

As a result, the Defendants assaulted the victim jointly with those who could not know their names.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field register pictures (18 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

1. Optional fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. On September 26, 2012, the Defendants were participating in an assembly on the increase of transportation charges held by the cargo rupture branch on the transportation island located within the king king ICD Sed on September 26, 2012. The Defendants discovered that the rupture driven by the victim D was parked in the signal signal, and the rupture with the persons whose name is unknown, set off the rup the rupture, set off some of the rup the rup on the opposite rupture, set off the rup the rup on the rupture, and interfere with the traffic of the victim by jointly collusion with the persons whose name is unknown, and interfere with the transportation of the cargo of the victim.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants asserted to the effect that, consistently, from the police to this court, they expressed that A had expressed a desire to d, such as “I have to drink and live together,” but they did not engage in any act, such as blocking D’s lelebls and exposing the driver’s seat.

B. Wel, D, immediately after the incident, are in the traffic signal atmosphere in the police.

arrow