The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although there was no misunderstanding of the fact that the victim's loss did not fall, there was an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's decision on the assertion of mistake of facts and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the trial court: ① The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court below that he did not have his fingers; ② the victim took care of his fingers at the time of the occurrence of the instant case; ③ the victim took care of his fingers at the hospital; ③ L, G, and J in the classroom at the time of the occurrence of the instant case: (a) the victim did not have any contact with the victim and the defendant; (b) the witness at the time of the classroom, L, G, and J did not look at the victim's body; but (c) the victim did not have any other contact with the victim, but it appears that the victim did not have a fingers by the victim; and (d) the victim did not agree with the victim at the time of the instant investigation; and therefore, (e) the court below's decision that the Defendant agreed with the victim at the time of consultation with the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. In comparison with the first instance court’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance court’s sentencing is reasonable in its discretion.