logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고단3631
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 8, 2013, the Defendant accessed F, who operates “Co. E” a prefabricated PC sales business entity, along with C and Ilman D, and pretended to normally acquire E as representative director by concluding a lease contract under the name of E with the victim vehicle leasing company and E, and agreed to receive the leased vehicle, and the Defendant, the representative director of C, who is a representative director, would be exempted from the lease obligation through bankruptcy proceedings three months after the conclusion of the lease contract.

1. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract for operating lease of vehicles worth KRW 72,422,720 of the said victim’s sales employees at the I’s business office of the victim Matz Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, on the following grounds: “The Defendant would pay KRW 1,885,530 per month for 36 months during the lease term,” while entering into a contract for operating lease of vehicles of KRW 72,422,720 for the said victim’s sales employees.

However, in fact, the Defendant was in bad credit standing, and C was merely 67 million won for credit guarantee insurance obligations, and C did not have the intent or ability to pay rent in a normal way even if the lease contract was concluded with no particular property or income, and it was thought that D would dispose of the leased vehicle.

On December 4, 2013, the Defendant, together with C, received 72,422,720 vehicles from the victim’s Gaz E300 vehicles owned by the victim at the factory located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Gero-dong.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with C, etc.

2. On December 9, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime against K ASEAN A6 vehicle: (a) between C and the Defendant and the Defendant: (b) the acquisition cost is 76,902, the acquisition cost between the Defendant and the Defendant, who was a vehicle with the Defendant, who was an employee of the Victim Dolur, and a vehicle with the Defendant, who was an employee of the Victim Dolur Co., Ltd., Ltd., a contract for the entrustment with the Defendant, at the above mother site office

arrow