logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단6926
절도
Text

The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 8. 13. 04:30경 서울 서초구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 여자화장실에서 900,000원 상당의 갤럭시노트5 휴대폰 1대, 현금 201,000원, 체크카드, 신분증 등이 들어 있는 피해자 D 소유의 시가를 알 수 없는 샤넬휴대폰케이스 1점을 들고 가 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to D's written statements;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 329 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for the suspension of sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the suspension of sentence: fine: KRW 500,000 won per day; detention in a workhouse: 100,000 won); the defendant is the first offender; the defendant is in profoundly reflected in the confession of the fact of the crime; the victim's abandonment resulted in contingent crimes; the victim's failure to pay reasonable money; the victim agreed to pay reasonable money; the damaged goods are sufficiently recovered from the victim's loss due to seizure and return to the victim; the defendant's social relationship is clear as the source of the company and the possibility of recidivism is low; and the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered; the defendant is punished by a fine, but the suspension of sentence shall be limited to only once.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow