1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,732,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from February 13, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 14, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff supplied 8,732,00 won goods payment claims to the defendant from May 22, 2014 to August 5, 2014 by supplying aquaculture equipment and water treatment chemicals, etc. [The evidence No. 2 (Tax Rate Electronic Tax Invoice) provides that "the recipient" is not the defendant, but the defendant is the party to the goods transaction with the plaintiff in this case, but the defendant does not dispute the plaintiff in this case on the premise that the defendant himself is the party to the goods transaction with the plaintiff. Rather, the defendant asserts that he had the right to claim damages against the plaintiff from the day following the date of the above recognition that the defendant is the party to the goods transaction with the plaintiff, barring special circumstances, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 8,732,000 won annual interest rate of 15% from the day following the day of the plaintiff's filing of this case to 2015%.

In regard to this, the Defendant alleged that there was a defect in the goods supplied by the Plaintiff and caused a total of 84,886,460 won (i.e., a total of 5,207,00 won for feed of 2,589,060 won for electricity of 5,207,000 won for labor of 17,000,000 won for disinfection of military administration subsidies of 3,090,400 won for the wholesale price of 57,000 won for a new letter closed of 1,2,11,12,15,16 for each item of evidence of 1,2,12, 15, and 16, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there was a defect in the goods supplied by the Plaintiff solely on the basis of each item of evidence of 1,2,11,12, 15, and 16, as alleged by the Defendant.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.