1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In around 1977, the Plaintiff’s father B newly constructed one unit of the instant building for reinforced concrete building 18 square meters in a dry 18th square meters (hereinafter “the instant building”) on the ground of Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, 105 (hereinafter “the instant land No. 1”), and newly constructed one unit of the instant building for 25 square meters in a dry 260 square meters (hereinafter “instant land No. 2”) around 1978, Kimcheon-si D, Kimcheon-si (hereinafter “the instant land No. 2”).

B. Around that time, the general building ledger on the instant building No. 1 and the instant building No. 2 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “each of the instant buildings”) (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building ledger”) was prepared. The instant building ledger is recorded only as “Gimcheon City C” the site location of each of the instant buildings.

C. The deceased B completed the registration of ownership preservation with No. 385 on January 16, 1979 for the instant building No. 1, the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, etc., and completed the registration of ownership preservation with No. 32341 on December 16, 1980 for the instant building No. 2, such as the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, etc.

On September 13, 2018, the Plaintiff, the heir of the network B, filed an application for the correction of a building indication requesting the Defendant to add the instant land No. 2 to the site location in the instant building ledger.

E. On September 21, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition imposing KRW 10,500,600 of the farmland preservation charges (hereinafter “instant disposition”) calculated on the basis of 30% of the officially assessed land price in 2018, based on the Plaintiff’s application for the diversion of farmland, on the ground that the land category of the instant land No. 2 falls under “the previous farmland” and thus, falls under farmland, and thus, the diversion of the said land to a site is necessary.

F. The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed an administrative appeal with the Standing Committee on Administrative Appeals, but the Standing Committee on Administrative Appeals on December 4, 2018.