1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,050,272,014 as well as 6% per annum from May 13, 2014 to January 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

A. On-site names are consistent, and the contract term of each of the instant contracts also coincide, as seen above.

[The contract statement of this case] The unit cost per unit quantity per unit of the name of construction type (cost) direct construction cost

1. Earth and sand 1-2. Sheet 1-8. H2.3 M 9,317,000 11,804,000 Y2.5 M 9,317 11,800 M 2.3 xW2.3 M 2.5 M 2,847 15,000 42,705,000 Y2.3M xB5.03M E 3200,000 60,000 x H2.3 M xB1.2M EA 278,000 x 1,566,000 x

2. According to the contract for high volume 2-3. 8-15. MaM 10M 10M 130 2,000 2,000 2-5. upper 2-5. H 16,000 M 10 M 7. 8. 30, 1000 M 16,300 M 100 M 769 16,304,000 indirect construction expenses -12.431% SIK 12.47, 447, 854 directly for employment and safety management - - 0. 07, 07, 000 M 20, 130, 205, 30, 30, 305, 206, 30, 305, 47, 97, 194, 56, 56, 205

The above-mentioned recognition.