logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.18 2016고단1777
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 10 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The name “D” and the Defendant, as a member of the telephone financial fraud organization, committed fraud and attempted fraud. On March 2016, 2016, “D” and “D” conspired in order to attract victims by means of “scaming,” etc., and the Defendant and the non-indicted employees in the name of the victim, who are “scams”, committed fraud and transfer money to the place of “D” order with the victims received money from the victims.

In accordance with the direction of "D", the non-name assistance employee was a phone call around 14:59 on March 11, 2016 to the victim E for an illegal crime.

The account should be investigated, and the money is withdrawn and kept.

On the same day, around 20:00 on the same day, the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, who signed and received money, made the victim withdraw the amount of KRW 17 million in cash from the new bank account (F) in the name of the victim, and had the victim deliver the amount of KRW 17 million in cash to the Defendant who misrepresented the “I” of the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service before the H coffee stores located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

As above, the Defendant conspired with the victims, including “D”, from March 11, 2016 to December 21, 201 of the same month, conspired with the victims, by means of “ Bosing,” etc., on a total of six occasions as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (i.e., “ Bosing,” etc., as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes. The Defendant was granted KRW 95,463,710 from three victims, and received KRW 95,463,710, which was the sum from three other victims. However, the Defendant did not intend to receive the sum of the amounts from three other victims, but did not intend to cause the victims to pay any doubtful money, thereby making it difficult for

2. The aforementioned “D” forged official document and instructed the Defendant to receive money from the victims by forging the membership card of the Financial Supervisory Service.

The Defendant, from March 11, 2016 to April 14 of the same month, set forth in the foregoing 1.

arrow