All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of the defendant is the confession of the crime of this case; the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; the circumstances favorable to the defendant; however, the law of the number of the crimes of this case is extremely poor; the total amount of damage to the crime of this case was not specified; the defendant did not agree with the victims; and the victim C wanting to be punished strictly against the defendant even when the victim C was in the first instance trial, the defendant exceeded the reasonable limits of the discretion of the judgment of the punishment, unlike other conditions of sentencing stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence; the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Committee; and unlike the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Committee.

In full view of the circumstances to be assessed, or the fact that there is no new material to be found in the course of a trial of sentencing on the political party (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015), etc., it is deemed that the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too heavy or unfasible and unfair, and thus, the argument that the sentencing of the Defendant and the prosecutor is unfair is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, they are all dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.