A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2.5 million at the Jeonju District Court, on April 11, 2007, to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, on May 28, 2008, to a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving), etc. on January 7, 2010, to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving), etc. on January 7, 2010, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) on June 19, 201.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more due to drinking driving, on May 27, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven Cho-do car while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.137% from the section of approximately 50 meters to the front road of the Yan-dong, Nam-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Namdong-dong, Namdong-gu, Namdong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Act on Reduction of Quantity are as follows: (a) Defendant was punished four times by a fine due to driving under the influence of alcohol in the past; (b) Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under the influence of alcohol in the past; and (c) Defendant was also sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under the influence of alcohol in the future; and (d) other circumstances such as Defendant’s age and occupation, living environment, and driving distance at the time of the crackdown, it is deemed appropriate to sentence the Defendant as above.