The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 02:40 on May 13, 2015, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, at the D convenience store located in the Namnamnam-gun: (b) around 02:40, the Defendant 2 of the facts charged: (c) the Defendant 1 took up two typosiss of plastics in the form of alcohol; (d) the victim E (22 years of age), “the Defendant 22 years of age”; (e) the victim E (22 years of age), “the her cokee of the glass and human disease being sealed in the form of a cokee to purchase all son,” and (e) the victim was her own victim, without calculating the excessive value of the son’s disease, calculated from the victim; and (e) the victim’s 1) the victim was removed from the victim’s her eye, namely, “the victim’s her eyee and her part of the son’s disease,” and (e) the victim’s her part of the son.

2. The facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her wish not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.