The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of one year and six months, the suspension of execution of three years and the suspension of execution of 280 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant appears to be against his mistake is recognized as normal in favor of the defendant.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant imported prohibited foods and sold them through an exaggerated advertisement; (b) the nature of the crime is heavy; (c) the transfer of unreported imported foods; and (d) there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (d) other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and character environment, and circumstances before

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.