A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

◈『2013고단4162』사건

1. On September 21, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.153% of blood alcohol concentration on September 21, 2013, and the Defendant driven Cgalgropo-three-line cargo vehicles in the section of about 2km from the stalo-line parking lot in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, or from the 1st floor parking lot in Daejeon-dong, to the calgro-type 3-line cargo vehicles in the section of about 2km from Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a galglass gallon 3 boom vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (AD).

On September 21, 2013, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as described in Paragraph 1, at around 22:30 on September 21, 2013, and driving the stalking and the parking lot of the 1st underground floor in the Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, with the speed of speed.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle while considering the situation of the front and rear left of the motor vehicle and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to take the front part of the victim E-ro vehicle owned by the victim D, which was parked in the front part of the above gallon 3 Do cargo vehicle. The victim F, who was parked in the front part of the gallon Do road, was placed in front of the right side and pent part of the gallon 3 Do cargo vehicle that was parked in the rear side. The rear part was placed behind the left side of the gallon 3 Do road that was parked in the left side while moving back, the victim H was placed in front of the left part of the gallon 3 Do cargo vehicle that was parked in the left part. The gallon Doar 3 Do road was placed in front of the gallon Do Do 1, and then was placed in front of the K-wing and the cargo vehicle owned by the victim, which was parked in the rear side by the gallon Do 1.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational negligence equivalent to KRW 1,766,176 of the repair cost, and the above rocketing car was repaired in KRW 1,517,96.