logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.06.12 2018고단2311
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On October 1, 2017, the Defendant was confined in the Daegu detention center C in the same room as 541-36, as the Daegu Suwon-gu L/C punishment on October 1, 2017, and was issued by a correctional officer who is not aware of his/her name, at the stroke m.

Along with the delivery to D without compensation from around 10 to October 28, 200, it was delivered 15 times in total to D 16 m through m of ske m, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (verification of the facts and medical records of the A Daegu detention center), investigation report (verification of the number of suspect Daegu detention center and whether a suspect A is jointly confined), and investigation report (as to the date of medication and delivery by the suspect D stroke stroke m);

1. A response to a request for appraisal, and a narcotics appraisal report;

1. Application of a copy of the mandatory record book, and the calendar statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions for criminal facts and Articles 61(1)5, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(d) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., and the Selection of Fines for the Punishment of Specific Crimes (except where the nature of a crime committed within a detention house during the period of repeated crime is not less than that of the crime; however, there are some reasons for the confession of and reflect against the crime; the motive and circumstance of the crime; the defendant has no economic benefits from the crime of this case; the defendant has no economic benefits from the crime of this case; and the defendant has no same criminal records)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. [the grounds for excluding the amount of 9 definitions by the stroke: 9 x 5,00 x 5,00 x 16 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m to be confiscated and confiscated, so it is reasonable to additionally collect only the amount of 9 m m m m m

arrow