The criminal facts of this case in the judgment of the defendant are as follows: one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the 2019 Highest 4515 case, and 2020 Highest 429 case.

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the judgment was finalized on February 15, 2017. On July 28, 2017, the parole period was terminated on September 28, 2017 (hereinafter “one previous criminal record at the time”) and the parole period was terminated on September 28, 2017, and on June 2, 2017, the Seoul Eastern District Court sentenced one year of the suspension of the execution of four months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual gambling (hereinafter “the two previous criminal records at the time”), and on March 12, 2019, the judgment became final and conclusive on October 1, 2019.

(hereinafter referred to as “three previous years in the market”) .. “2019 Highest 4515”

1. On May 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) phoneed the victim B around the new wall (Seoul) around May 4, 2016, the Defendant concluded that “A house, who was unable to pay the said investment fraud, was in excess of auction and her mother was seated; (b) he/she was paid the said money promptly. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million, he/she would have repaid the said money, he/she would have repaid the said money in the month at the latest.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that it would be used for personal purposes such as gambling money, and there was no intention or ability to repay as promised because the Defendant was liable for financial rights worth KRW 120 million without any special income.

Around May 9, 2016, the Defendant, through a bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant, remitted the sum of KRW 4 million and KRW 10 million in the sum of KRW 6 million from the victim to the Cbank account (D) in the name of the Defendant.

2. On June 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested a victim to repay the money borrowed from the victim at the G coffee shop in front of the F Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) requested the victim to obtain the money by Chinese investment; and (c) requested the victim to obtain the money to bring the fraud into Chinese investment; and therefore, (d) required the expense to bring the fraud into Chinese investment.