The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. 1) The Defendant did not have any intention to make a false accusation as to the false accusation.

2) On April 7, 2017, the Defendant only acted as described in this part of the facts charged for the purpose of defending the victims by assaulting them.

3) On April 8, 2017, the Defendant only acted as described in this part of the facts charged for the purpose of defending the victim’s assault and obstruction of one’s duty.

4) On March 27, 2017, the Defendant did not have assaulted the victim with respect to his special assault.

5) The Defendant merely entered the victim’s house, which appears to be a house or point to simply avoid a intrusion upon residence, and did not have any intention to intrude upon residence.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the charges on the Defendant by taking account of the evidence as indicated in the judgment.

In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and otherwise there is an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant in the judgment below.

subsection (b) of this section.

A. As to the accusation, a police officer appears to have performed legitimate duties, such as sending out after receiving a report 112, confirming the site and confirming the party’s personal information, and H was threatened with the Defendant to be detained as an offender in the act of committing a crime when 112 reports are filed by the Defendant, or did not deal with the reported case.

Although it cannot be seen, the Defendant submitted a written complaint with the same content as that stated in this part of the facts charged.

B. On April 7, 2017, the victims of their special assault from an investigative agency to the court below’s decision.