The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the sentence of No. 1, No. 2-A, and No. 2-B: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, the sentence of No. 2-A and (2) as stated in the decision: imprisonment with prison labor for two months) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the record of judgment are: (a) the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months on May 4, 2012 to imprisonment with labor for an attempted special larceny; (b) on May 12, 2012, at the Daegu District Court sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence of two years on the grounds of his/her imprisonment with labor for the crime of attempted special larceny; (c) he/she again committed some of the crimes of this case without being aware of the suspended sentence period; (d) the special larceny of this case committed repeatedly with the defendant, who is an accomplice, over a long period of time; and (e) the nature of the crime is not very good; (e) the total amount of damage was 13,652,00 won; and (e) the total amount of damage was 280,000 won; (e) it is difficult to view that the defendant did not agree with the victims; and (e) he/she made a serious effort to reimburse damage; (e) the criminal punishment of this case and other circumstances similar to the crime of this case; (e.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (However, since it is obvious that there is any error in the facts of the crime of the court below, it is obvious that there is a clerical error in the facts of the crime, and thus, it is corrected as changing "after April 28, 2012 to "after April 15, 2012" in Article 25 (1) and 4 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.