logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.22 2019나37341
구상금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Of the appeal costs, the part between the plaintiff and the defendant is the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

On October 30, 2018, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle D E of the Plaintiff insured vehicle, and around 14:45 on October 30, 2018 at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, at the place of the G Hospital located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant intersection”), was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle at around 14:45 on October 30, 2018, leading the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the intersection from the bank to the intersection of the bank, while passing through the intersection of this case, the accident of this case, which conflicts with the Defendant’s vehicle and the Plaintiff’s vehicle entering the main road of the Plaintiff’s vehicle bypassing from the right side, was destroyed by the front part and front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and the front part of the left side part of the Defendant’s vehicle, including the amount of insurance money paid to KRW 2,500,000 self-paid vehicle’s own damage charge, KRW 200,000,01.

2. Determination

A. The evidence revealed as follows: (a) at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was passing through the instant intersection while driving the two-lanes of the three-lanes depending on the traffic signal; (b) the Defendant’s driver was trying to enter the instant intersection after the Plaintiff’s moving to the intersection; and (c) the Defendant’s vehicle’s moving to the intersection was continued at the three-lanes where the Defendant’s moving to the intersection, among the driving roads of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Defendant’s moving to the intersection; (d) the Defendant’s moving to the intersection, among the driving roads of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, continued the vehicle’s moving to the intersection; and (e) the Defendant’s driver attempted to enter the two-lanes of the white zone by breaking to the safety zone; and (e) the instant accident that conflicts with the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving to the two-lanes during the said process. In light of the above, the Defendant’s driver’s moving to the right.

arrow