Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2017, the Defendant reported that the victim C (44 years of age) was frighting to the Defendant in front of Dong-gu, Dong-si, Dong-gu, 238 20-gilh 20, and caused the victim’s clothes once, and frightened the victim’s face by drinking flaps, and flabing the victim’s face by drinking flab, and flabing it over the victim’s face by drinking flab, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. A report on internal investigation (in the course of the occurrence of the case, etc.), investigation report (in the course of the occurrence of the case, attaching photographs to the CCTV image data and to the closure data), CCTV image CD, injury diagnosis report, and images of the part of the injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defendant and his defense counsel did not have any fact at the time of the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case, and committed a domestic act.

Even the defendant's act is a legitimate defense to defend the victim's assault.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which were duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., the victim C, from the investigative agency to the present court, had a dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant, and the Defendant, who was smoking tobacco in the vicinity of the apartment while parking the vehicle in front of the apartment, was able to draw up, and the Defendant was able to draw up to the end of the instant case.

The defendant is a multilateral defendant.