1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a dentist who operated the “Dental clinic” located in Suwon-si C.

B. The Plaintiff was already suffering from the fact that he had already received the steel treatment in the smallest Mazin (Ma35), etc., but, on April 26, 2014, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s hospital to the Defendant that “The Republic of Korea Central Republic of Korea Central Republic Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do” was called “the cause for the distribution of the protetra Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

C. On May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the same symptoms, and visited the Defendant hospital, and the Defendant thereafter took corrective steps, such as partially deleting the baby by July 17, 2014.

After that, the Plaintiff continued to suffer from the same symptoms on July 30, 2014, visited a dental hospital of the tobacco generation school and received a medical examination and treatment, and received a diagnosis of "unlawful conformity". On November 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the same hospital from among the "malutical disorder".

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap's 1 through 3, the result of the entrustment of appraisal of medical records to the Korean Dental Association, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Plaintiff suffered from the Plaintiff’s negligence caused by the following Defendant’s negligence. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 23,565,028, a sum of KRW 23,565,000, a solatium paid by the Plaintiff until February 25, 2015, as part of the Plaintiff’s active damages, to the Plaintiff.

1) The Defendant did not produce a dental model in advance while carrying out the teaching method of patha deletion method. 2) The Defendant did not transfer the Plaintiff to a senior medical institution in time, even though the Plaintiff carried out the teaching method of patha deletion method more than seven times, and the symptoms were not favorable.

3. The defendant means to delete part of the baby.