The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실 오인 내지 법리 오해 (1) 공무집행 방해 및 상해의 점 ㈎ 피해자 F에 대하여, 피해자가 먼저 피고인의 소매를 잡아당겨 이를 뿌리치다가 피해자의 긴 머리카락에 손가락이 걸린 것일 뿐 피고인이 피해자의 얼굴을 밀치 거사 머리를 잡아 흔든 사실이 없다.

㈏ 피해자 G가 양손으로 피고인을 팔을 잡았을 때 피고인의 가슴 부위에 닿아 성 추행당하는 것으로 느껴 이를 방어하기 위해 피해자의 팔을 깨문 것이므로, 정당 방위에 해당한다.

(2) The fact of insult is that the victim H asked her son and her son in the classroom where the Defendant’s father is accompanied by the Defendant’s father and asked her son and her son with his her son’s mind, and there is no fact

B. The sentence of the lower court against an unfair defendant in sentencing (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, one year of observation of protection, one year of community service, 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant assaulted the victim F to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties as stated in the crime No. 1 of the judgment below, thereby hindering the victim F from performing official duties and causing injury to the victim at the same time.

(2) In light of the circumstances and the method and degree of the Defendant’s injury inflicted on the Defendant’s hand, etc., it is difficult to deem that the Defendant’s act of committing this part of the crime constitutes a case where there is considerable reason to defend the Defendant’s current unfair infringement or to prevent such infringement.

(3) Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant’s performance of the victim H is insulting as stated in the facts constituting the crime No. 2 of the lower judgment.