logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고합355
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of the right of defense, part of the facts charged was revised.

On January 28, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months in Seoul Western District Court for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On November 24, 2011, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced the Defendant to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On April 24, 2015, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced the Defendant to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual night structure intrusion theft. On October 6, 2018, the Defendant completed the last execution of the sentence.

Criminal facts

피고인은 2018. 11. 13. 02:35경 서울 광진구 B에 있는 피해자 C이 운영하는 ‘D’ 음식점에서 이어폰 줄을 동그랗게 말아서 출입문 틈에 집어넣고 당기는 방법으로 출입문 잠금장치를 열고 침입하여, 그곳 카운터에 놓여있던 잠기지 않은 금고를 열어 그 안에 있던 피해자 소유인 현금 30만 원을 가지고 나와 절취한 것을 비롯하여 그 때부터 2018. 11. 25. 04:19경까지 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 5회에 걸쳐 피해자들 소유인 시가 합계 79만 원 상당의 재물을 절취하였다.

As a result, the defendant was sentenced to punishment twice or more due to larceny, etc., and habitually stolen the victims' property within three years after the execution of the sentence is completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the public prosecutor (second time, No. 28 of the evidence list);

1. Written statements prepared by C, E, F, and G;

1. Investigation report (suspect tracking, tracking suspects, 2) and attached materials (Evidence Nos. 15-18);

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal history records, investigation reports (reports to confirm the criminal records of the same kind of crime of the suspect), police suspect interrogation records of the accused (first time and evidence list Nos. 6);

1. Habituality of the judgment: The records of each crime in the judgment and the crime in this case shall be set aside using tools.

arrow