Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 500,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2014, at around 11:00, the Defendants attempted to block the public water supply located adjacent to the G frequency of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant F (53 years) from the victim F (the victim F) on the passage of the E 2nd floor located in Gunsan City, Do. At around 11:00, the Defendants attempted to block the Defendant A, and the Defendant A was the victim “humping fe., Maz.”

“In doing so, the victim’s scam belts and breaths are shakened by cutting down the victim’s scam. Defendant B scamed with rubber scam, 2 to 3 times with the victim’s left part, and scamed with the victim’s left part, and scamed with the victim’s hand scam and scam with the victim’s left part, and scamed with other necessary treatment for about 2 weeks and the upper part of the part below the arms.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement (limited to Defendant A);

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. Part of the statement made by the defendant A during the police interrogation protocol (two times) concerning F;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the medical certificate, the defendant B and the defense counsel

1. The summary of the claim is that the defendant B only satisfyed the dispute between the defendant A and the victim, and the victim does not use violence against the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence of the judgment, we cannot accept the above assertion since Defendant B’s assault is recognized.

A. When the investigation agency conducts an investigation into the identity of the victim with the victim, the defendant A put the victim's arms as soon as possible at the time of the investigation.

There was no fact that there was anything else.

The police made a statement "(No. 23)" (Evidence List 23), and thereafter, the police did not know how it was less severe because of the lack of mind because it was in dispute with the victim.

Defendant B asked the victim’s arms when he was investigated.

A statement shall be made only after old, and it shall be open to the public.

“Written argument” (No. 7) and the Prosecutor’s Office.