(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.06.09 2016가단228474

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.06.09 2016가단228474

배당이의

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The details of the establishment of the right to collateral security - Three registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security - The establishment of the right to collateral security - the third establishment of the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the right to collateral security - the

(1) On March 31, 2014, KRW 111,60,000 on April 14, 2014, KRW 30,000, KRW 12935,00, KRW 24,000 on February 27, 2015, KRW 24,00,000 on the receipt date of the registration office, provided that the scope of the secured obligation of the first secured mortgage shall be limited to the scope of the secured obligation of the second secured mortgage, and that the third secured obligation of the company other than the lawsuit shall be borne by the bank in the present and in the future by all transactions in the following categories:

- The contract establishing the second right to collateral security is a limited collateral to the scope of the obligation subject to the second right to collateral security, and the appearance of the transaction was written in the column to state the transaction’s name, stating that the company outside the lawsuit should be “any obligation to be incurred at present and in the future due to the following transactions:

- The third contract to establish a collective security is a limited collateral to the scope of the obligation to be secured by the third collective security, stating the phrase "transaction with general loan for business operation" in the column to state the type of transaction, stating that the third collective security contract is "any obligation to be borne by the company outside the lawsuit in the present and future due to the following transactions:

The Bank shall pay money to the non-party company four times as follows:

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2017.08.31 2016가합77090

-수원고등법원 2020.12.10 2020노578

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.06.21 2018가단31206

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고합90

-수원지방법원 2018.05.24 2017나68684