The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

The summary of the facts charged is the person who manages the above studio under the delegation of E, the owner of the "Dbudio" in the Si of Seocheon-si in Gyeonggi-do, and the victim F is the person who received the key of the above 10,000 won as collateral for the 30,000 won loaned to G and kept his clothes and tools and resided in the room of the above two places.

around July 2012, the Defendant opened a door to the key received from the above G for the purpose of moving the victim's studio 101 to the room of 207, and entered the above room 101 and moved all the goods owned by the victim to 207 to 207. However, the Defendant appears to be a clerical error.

The victim's residence was invaded by moving and moving animals.

Judgment

A. We can see that there is a statement in F, G investigative agencies, and this court as shown in the facts charged in the instant case.

However, according to the statements of H and I in this court, H opened room on May 23, 2012 to lease the Dudio building; H shows 101 and 207 to H; H entered into a lease agreement on May 25, 2012 as to the above Dudio 101; however, H visited the above subparagraph 101 to prepare directors on May 28, 2012; H changed the key to H, and H changed the key to 101 to 207.

Therefore, it is insufficient to recognize that the statement of F and G infringed upon a residence by the Defendant, not the I, as stated in the facts charged.

B. Even if there is a fact that the defendant had a manager, and caused him/her to intrude into his/her residence, the statement of the F and G as seen earlier are insufficient to recognize it, as well as the statement of G. G and J.