The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C-owned D-city bus.

On November 6, 2012, the Defendant driven the above bus at around 22:55, and started driving three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the Suwon-dong Office 173-3, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Suwon-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes in the basin of the river basin, while driving the three-lanes of the three-lanes of the bus at the bus stops in the Suwon-dong 3-dong Office.

At the time, a crosswalk is installed near the central bus stop at night, and there is a place adjacent to it, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, by negligence of neglecting the duty of the brupt, the Defendant caused the victim E (the age of 57) to cut off the crosswalk to the port from the right side of the direction of the Defendant’s running.

Ultimately, on November 9, 2012, the Defendant caused the death of the victim E by occupational negligence, resulting in the death of cerebral function ma while receiving treatment at G Hospital located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

The main point of the defendant's defense is that the vehicle of the defendant started according to the progress signal and the victim went to his own crosswalk, so there is no negligence on the part of the defendant who neglected his duty of front-time care.

Judgment

A driver who operates a road shall not be held liable for the driver's breach of duty of care in performing his/her duties of care, unless he/she has trusted in complying with all traffic regulations and operated the road on the basis of such trust.

However, such principle of trust is excluded if there are special circumstances in which it is impossible for the other party traffic controller to believe that the vehicle is operated or walking in accordance with all road traffic-related laws and regulations.