logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.12 2017가단5018302
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The party's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties, including the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment and 1 Dong 306 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) that the Defendant leased and occupied, received a disposition of the management and disposal plan under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and publicly notified on December 1, 2016, and set the relocation period until March 2017. The Defendant sought delivery in possession of the instant apartment.

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant asserted that the instant apartment was delivered to the Plaintiff on March 22, 2017, prior to the relocation period for which the Plaintiff demanded the delivery of the instant apartment.

B. According to the statement No. 4, the Plaintiff’s relocation period from December 20, 2016 to March 31, 2017 for a housing reconstruction project can be acknowledged as having been publicly announced to its members and tenants from December 20, 2016 to March 31, 2017. The Defendant’s delivery of the instant apartment to the Plaintiff on March 22, 2017 is not a dispute between the parties, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is therefore without merit.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow