logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2018.05.02 2016고정85
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant (hograph) under the trade name of “D” in the Cheongbuk-gun voice C.

1. No person of the 2016 Highly 85 shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles or provide such drugs free of charge to juveniles;

Nevertheless, on October 17, 2015, the Defendant sold and provided 68,000 won of f8,000 won, such as 1, 1, 1, and 1, 1, 2000 won of f3,000 won of f3,00 won of f8,000 won of f3,00 juveniles and 5, and f3,000 of f3,00 juveniles and f3,00

2. No person of "2018 Highest 127" shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, on December 24, 2017, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages, such as 3 enlisted alcoholic beverages, which are juvenile harmful drugs, without verifying identification cards to F (18 years of age) and G (18 years of age) within the aforementioned D “D” on December 24, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 85"

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. The part concerning the statement E or I in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. The defendant and I's written confirmation [the defendant and his defense counsel sold alcoholic beverages to three adults who completed the daily identification card inspection as stated in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the defendant, and the juveniles such as E sold alcoholic beverages to the above three adults in combination with the above adults in the defendant's site, and they asserted that they did not sell alcoholic beverages to them.

Therefore, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the above evidence and recording records, namely, ① the legal statement of E and I, is inconsistent with the content of confirmation prepared by the police station at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, and it is only clear that they did not drink at D’s stores, and it does not memory all the remaining circumstances at the time of the instant case, including the developments leading up to the preparation of confirmation form by the police.

arrow