logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2012.08.30 2012고정70
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(개인정보누설등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “B”) is a corporation that runs the business of installing LGU Plus’ Internet telephones, etc., and A/S subordinate, and the Defendant is the representative director, C and D are those who work as A/S engineer from B to B.

On May 1, 2010, the Defendant instructed the collection of the telephone numbers of the members of the SKB World in an open meeting of the executives at the office of Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, U.S. B, to attract customers.

1. C, from May 17, 2010 to December 12:09 of the same day, from around 10:59, C, and D, in order to collect the phone numbers of its customers, C, in an integrated group box of 103 Dong-dong 103, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, 103, and one-story (IDF group) for the purpose of collecting the phone numbers of its customers, C, which connects the phone numbers for disability treatment to the communications line of the SKB-dong 103, 301 G (ma, 44 years old) with the F-based phone numbers of its cell phone numbers, such as collecting the H phone numbers of 103, 301, 103, 104, 105, and 305,00 households, such as the list of crimes (1).

Accordingly, in collusion with C and D, the Defendant infringed on the information and communication network of Skbrode without access authority.

2. C and D collected, in order from May 18, 2010 to May 15:29 of the same day, a personal information number of the E Apartment Complex (106 Dong, 107 Dong, 209 Dong, 209 Dong, 106 Dong, 106 Dong, 106 Dong, and 106 Dong, 502 (Nam, 61 year old) telephone numbers of the subscribers, such as collecting the telephone numbers of 106 Dong, 502 Dong, 502 Dong, and 61 year old, in order as shown in the attached list of crimes (2), E apartment complex (106 Dong, 107 Dong), 2 complex (202 Dong, 209 Dong), 23 households.

Accordingly, in collusion with C and D, the Defendant infringed on the information and communication network of Skbrode without access authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against A, C, or D;

1. Statement of each police statement against K and L;

1. A report of investigation as the other party investigation, investigation records as well as investigation records;

arrow