logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.22 2017고단2071
장애인활동지원에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 2,00,000, Defendant C’s fine of KRW 1,000,000, and Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of “H” in the G 4th floor in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and Defendant B, C, and D are assistants belonging to the above center.

1. No person who is a defendant A may claim expenses for the benefit of persons with disabilities by fraud or other improper means;

Nevertheless, on May 24, 2012, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around May 24, 2012, filed a claim for additional benefit for a single-person household by preparing a “application for social welfare service and benefit (change)” as if the Defendant were living alone in the residence, even though his spouse and child did not move to the local area, and submitted it to the public official of the said Gu office.

The Defendant received KRW 91,116,090 from the Korea Social Security Information Institute in 2012, KRW 20,882,60 in 2013, KRW 27,473,350 in total, KRW 33,529,940 in 2015, KRW 5,670 in 2016, and KRW 91,116,090 in H’s account.

Accordingly, the defendant accused by deceiving the victim and by deceiving the money, and claimed the expenses for the benefit of the disabled by illegal means.

2. The Defendants were willing to make a false claim for expenses incurred in providing activity support benefits by registering the fact that Defendants B, C, and C, an assistant of activity, are holding the voucher, and even without providing activity support allowances to Defendant A, the said B and C were registered on the device used for settling the cost of activity support benefits using the said card and claiming false expenses for activity support benefits.

No person shall make a claim for expenses incurred in paying benefits to persons with disabilities by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, around September 2015, the Defendants conspired with the Defendant at the office of Defendant A, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I apartment house No. 206, 2204, and fact that Defendant B and C did not assist in night activities, and even though Defendant D was supported at night activities, the above part was completed.

arrow