logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고단3161
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The criminal defendant against the victim C is driving a taxi around September 2009.

It is the difference between the victim and the customer.A.

On November 2009, the Defendant had the victim purchase KRW 70,000 to KRW 80,000,00,000, which is the lower price for the 32-year-type apartment through the pro-sports D working in the court, where the Defendant was distributed to the employees of the court, for the victim at the address of not more than Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Busan. The Defendant made a false statement.

However, the defendant only intended to use the money received from the victim for travel expenses, etc., and there was no kind of relationship working in the court, and there was no ability or intention to introduce the purchase of apartment.

On December 4, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 680,000 from the victim, from that time until April 15, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 56,43,400 throughout 61 times in total under the name of apartment price, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

B. On January 2010, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant would have employed the two children through E and F working in the S-Otile” to the victim in the address of the Seocho-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “S-Otil”). As such, it is necessary to pay KRW 25 million or KRW 30 million in terms of employment expenses.”

However, the defendant only intended to use the money received from the victim for travel expenses, etc., there is no friendship in S-Oil, and there was no intention or ability to have the victims employed.

On January 19, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 2.4 million from the victim, from that time until May 13, 2010, from that time, from that time, 25,282,60 won in total for employment expenses, as shown in the attached Table (2).

2. The criminal defendant against the victim G shall be an employment expense from other victims via C, with the acquisition of money from the victim C in the name of employment expense.

arrow