1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 23,324,694 as well as KRW 23,177,728 among the Defendants, from April 17, 2014.

1. The description of the request shall be as shown in the attached Form;

2. Grounds for judgment

(a) Defendant 1 and 2: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. As to the judgment against Defendant 3 and 4, the said Defendants assumed office as an internal director of Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) on January 29, 2013 upon B’s request, and resigned on or around August 6, 2013. However, they asserted that there was no direct signature and seal on the joint and several surety column of the instant car siren contract (as of March 6, 2013, evidence No. 1).

However, according to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 12 (including each voice part of Gap 10 through 12), Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the whole arguments, the defendants are obligated to pay the claim amount of this case (which is the joint and several liability surety) jointly with the defendant company and Eul as a joint and several liability surety, because the defendants knew that the above documents were signed and sealed as joint and several liability surety under the automobile rental contract of this case upon Eul's request and knew that they were signed and sealed as joint and several liability surety under the automobile rental contract of this case.