logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고정2928
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the tenant of Suwon-si C Apartment Complex.

On July 19, 2016, at the multi-purpose conference room of the above C apartment on July 19, 2016, in front of the representatives of occupants and other residents who attended the representative conference of the occupants on July 19, 2016, the Defendant expressed that the victims were the victims who suffered the same clothes as the victim D, the CCTV Dong-young, and the video screen with the victim E on July 15, 2016, where the victims suffered the victims were exposed to the video of the representative conference of occupants on July 19, 2016, by directly linking them with the video of the representative conference of occupants on July 2016.

However, there was no fact that the victims did not damage the tree support team.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (the results of checking the video images of the representative meeting of occupants on July 19, 2016);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each letter of complaint and a record of the meeting of representatives of occupants;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is true, but it does not infringe the honor of the victims because it was not clear that the victims are presumed to be those who damaged the tree support unit on the spot, and therefore, it constitutes a legitimate act in the course of business since the defendant presented video data on the obstruction of the business of the representative meeting of the occupants proposed at the representative meeting of the apartment occupants as the agenda at the representative meeting of the occupants of the apartment house and on the civil petition related to the damage of the tree support unit to know the occupants' right to know.

The method of indicating facts in the crime of sacrificing and defamation.

arrow