The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable condition that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflects the mistake in depth, that the Defendant himself/herself and cooperates with the investigation by clarifying most of the criminal facts that the investigative agency did not recognize, and that the amount of theft is relatively large.

However, according to the following circumstances, the Defendant committed the instant crime more than 10 times in a total of 3 to 4 months by intrusion upon the victim’s residence and theft, and the nature of the crime is inferior, even though the Defendant had been punished for larceny in 1999, 2002, 2006, and 2015, it is highly likely that the instant crime might be repeatedly committed and the risk of repeating the same type of crime is high, and the Defendant did not agree with the victims up to the trial, and did not recover from damage.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means, consequence, etc. of the crime and various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and the previous theories, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.