1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

At the time of the accident, around 12:05 December 27, 2018 at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle attempted to change the vehicle into the five lanes near the Hannam-dong Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, to the four lanes to three lanes. The Defendant’s vehicle driving after the Plaintiff’s vehicle changed from the four lanes to the three lanes and attempted to change the lanes to the three lanes, while the Defendant’s vehicle driving after the Plaintiff’s vehicle was overtaking the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Defendant’s vehicle, who attempted to change the lanes as above, was paid the insurance money paid to the Defendant’s 4,268,00 won as the insurance money for the collision, and KRW 50,000,000 of the self-paid self-paid amount of the

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties that the plaintiff is asserting that the collision occurred when the defendant's vehicle intends to overtake the plaintiff's vehicle in an unreasonable way without sufficiently considering the movement of the plaintiff's vehicle prior to it, and that the negligence of the defendant's vehicle should also be taken into account. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that the defendant's vehicle is an inevitable accident since the plaintiff's vehicle's replacement of the course from the four lanes to the three lanes, which is the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle, was driven by the defendant's vehicle while changing the course from the four lanes to the three lanes without indicating his own direction, etc.

B. The following circumstances, which can be recognized by comprehensively considering the evidence as mentioned above and the overall purport of oral arguments, are as follows, namely, the Defendant’s vehicle moving to the Plaintiff’s vehicle from the fourth lane to the third lane, but the vehicle was changing from the fourth lane to the third lane without using direction direction, etc., and the Defendant’s vehicle also tried to change the fourth lane to the third lane.