The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six years of imprisonment) is too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The judgment of this case is that the defendant planned to commit an indecent act against an unspecified female with his accomplice, and then committed an indecent act on the apartment elevator following a high school student who was found by chance, and the nature of the crime was very serious in the circumstances and contents of the crime, the defendant prepared the wall and her mother in preparation for the detection of the crime, the victim seems to have suffered a considerable mental impulse and sexual humiliation, and the defendant did not receive a written request from the victim up to the trial.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant makes a confession from the court below to replace the crime, the fact that the defendant seems to have failed to receive proper sex education with the disabled of class 2 with hearing disability, and that the defendant has no criminal records, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

그 밖에 피고인의 연령, 전과, 성행, 환경, 가족관계, 범행의 동기와 경위, 범행 후의 정황 등 여러 가지 양형의 조건들과 대법원 양형위원회의 양형기준에 따른 권고형량 범위 ◇ 법률상 처단형의 범위 : 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 ◇ 양형기준의 적용 [유형의 결정] 성범죄 > 일반적 기준 > 강제추행죄(13세 이상 대상) > 제2유형(특수강제추행) [권고영역] 감경영역 특별감경인자 : 농아자 [권고형의 범위] 징역 1년 6월 ~ 3년 를 종합하면, 원심이 피고인에 대하여 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당하다고 보이지 아니하므로, 검사의 주장은 이유 없다.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.