Text
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant D, as to each of the said money, KRW 6,00,000, and each of the said money, from July 25, 2014 to June 2015.
Reasons
1. The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the annexed sheet.
2. Judgment of confession as to the claim against Defendant B and D (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. Determination as to claims against Defendant C, E, F, G, and H
A. The above defendants sent a passbook and cash card under their name to the name-based person (the defendant C, E, and H sent a loan to the name-based person with low interest. The defendant C, E, and H sent the name-based person with low interest.
(2) On July 25, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) received a call from an unexploded person who misrepresented the staff of the Busan District Prosecutor’s Office to the effect that “the Plaintiff’s name savings bank opened to the website and resolved it by accessing the website of the Financial Supervisory Service; and (b) entered the Plaintiff’s resident registration number, account number, and password by accessing the website designated by the unexploded person.”
Based on the Plaintiff’s information on the same day, the name-free person transferred 6 million won from the Plaintiff’s Korea Savings Bank account to the Plaintiff’s new bank account in the name of Defendant C; 5.95 million won in total to the Defendant E’s name-based Saemaul Savings Depository account in the name of Defendant E; 5.95 million won in total to the Defendant F’s corporate bank account twice; 5.955 million won in total to the Defendant G corporate bank account in the name of Defendant G bank account in the name of Defendant G, and 2.99 million won in total to the
3) On the same day, the Plaintiff was called from the person who was not the deceased’s name to the effect that “The Plaintiff’s nominal Gwangju Bank account will be able to make their own financial transactions only at the time when the Plaintiff owned the Plaintiff’s household,” and was informed of the number on the OPT device (OPT) device necessary for the account transfer. On the same day, the Plaintiff transferred 29.3 billion won from the Plaintiff’s Gwangju Bank account via the Plaintiff’s information. (4) The Plaintiff immediately reported the damage to the Defendant’s account to the police station, but the money transferred to the Defendant’s account.