1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs as to the circumstances of the disposition may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence No. 1 through 7:

On December 7, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Army and completed education and training for a new soldier at the 50th Sick Education Team, and served at the 50th Sick Team from January 4, 2011.

On January 27, 2011, the Plaintiff received from the Armed Forces Daegu Hospital the examination of the “Past 4/5 Pastical Nuclear Smoking” and received from the said hospital several times until October 20, 201, including the Plaintiff’s repeated entry into and discharge from the said hospital by October 20, 2011. “The Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital due to symptoms, such as the chronic damage of the stoves, chronic damage of the stoves, the left-hand slots, and the left-hand slots, etc.” due to the symptoms, such as “stoves from the border, stoves, and stoves on the left-hand slots,” and was discharged from the hospital on December 19, 2011.

B. On December 20, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and applied for registration to the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) during the military service on December 20, 2011, “mipathal spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on July 7, 2012, but was dismissed on January 8, 2013.

On January 22, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for registration to the Defendant again, but the Defendant rendered the instant disposition on June 3, 2013 on the ground that the causal link between military duties or education and training was not recognized between the injury and disease in the instant case.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In full view of the circumstances delineated below the Plaintiff’s assertion, there is a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s performance of duties or education and training of each of the superior branches of this case.

The plaintiff, who had been healthy before being admitted to the first workplace, shall be admitted to the 50th Infant Education Team.