1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 5, 1914, the Defendant received the assessment of each of the instant land, and completed the registration of ownership preservation in the name of the Defendant on April 11, 2006.

B. The Plaintiff purchased and occupied the land No. 1 from the Defendant around the end of the 1970s, and sold it to the Plaintiff on or around February 15, 198. D around 1949, pursuant to the Farmland Reform Act, sold the land No. 2 to the Plaintiff on or around February 15, 198. Around 1949, D sold the land No. 10 through 49,10 square meters to the Plaintiff on board (hereinafter “the part against which the land No. 2 was lost”) and sold the land No. 7,211 square meters (hereinafter “the part against which the Plaintiff lost the land No. 2”), among the land No. 2, sold the land of this case to the Plaintiff on or around 206, the Plaintiff did not file an appeal against the Plaintiff on the day of pleading for the completion of the prescription of 2,125 square meters on or around 2005, and sold the land to the Plaintiff on or around 26, 2075.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Entry of Gap evidence 6 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the land No. 1 of this case was purchased from the Defendant in the mid 1950s and occupied and cultivated by the F, and thereafter the Plaintiff commenced possession on February 15, 198. The land No. 2 of this case purchased from the Defendant in the mid 1950s and occupied and cultivated by E, and the Plaintiff commenced possession on September 25, 1978. The land No. 3 of this case purchased from the Defendant in the mid 1950s and possessed by the Plaintiff on July 12, 1987.