Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and a fine of 14,00,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant works as a police officer (class slope) belonging to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency D, and is a person in charge of criminal intelligence, repair, collection, investigation, etc.

1. On June 2010, the Defendant: (a) requested from G, H, and I, a gas station operator in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “G, H, and I (a gas station operator), who is a gas station operator in Songpa-gu, is able to remove money by threateninging the drug points of a gas station operator selling similar petroleum; (b) by investigating the person; and (c) received KRW 10 million in cash from G in the “J” house located in Songpa-gu, Seoul around the summer-gu, Seoul; and (d) received a request from G in the “J” house located in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, for its investigation expenses.

2. The Defendant received KRW 50,000,000 in total KRW 20,00 from H under the above title from the “Lriju station” in the operation of H and I located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon.

3. The Defendant received meals from H and I along with the police officers of “N” house located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and received drinking and entertainment from H on the studal harassment in which the trade name on the second floor of the building adjacent to the “O hotel” building in the above 2nd class of the house, and received one million won in cash from H under the above pretext.

4. The Defendant received KRW 2 million in cash from H under the above pretext at a multi-face where it is difficult to know the trade name in front of the metropolitan investigation unit (out of office) located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency (out of office) around September 2010 and the trade name in front of the metropolitan investigation unit (out of office) in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the Defendant received a bribe equivalent to KRW 14 million in total from G and H in relation to the duties of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness G and H’s legal statement;

1. Each part of the protocol of interrogation of the accused by the prosecution against the accused (including G of the third protocol and H substitute part);

1. A copy of the suspect examination protocol concerning G by the prosecution, and