logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.06.19 2019고정60
협박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2018, around 19:10 on October 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) in front of the D convenience store in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) threatened the victim E, who is his father, of B, with the damage of the victim E; and (c) brea the Defendant “Wook kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victims by showing the attitude of causing harm to the life or body of the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On October 3, 2018, around 19:10 on October 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven away from the D convenience store located in Sungnam-si A, Sungnam-si; (b) carried away the victim B (n, 44 years old); (c) carried an article, i.e., “Woo wanting to be killed by the police station”; and (d) laid down the scarb.

계속하여 피고인은 피해자 B이 걸음을 멈춰 서서 쳐다보면 피고인은 딴청을 피우며 종이를 꺼내서 볼펜으로 무언가를 적는 시늉을 하고, 다시 피해자 B이 걸어가면 피해자를 뒤쫓아 가고, 피해자가 “먼저 가라”고 길을 비켜 주어도 딴청을 피우며 피해자 B이 걸어가면 피고인도 피해자를 따라 같이 걷는 등으로 피해자를 위협하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victims by showing the attitude of causing harm to the life or body of the victims.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, on May 29, 2019, the victim made a statement to the effect that “the defendant does not want to be punished,” after the prosecution of this case, Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow