logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.02.09 2016고합119
통신비밀보호법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and suspension of qualifications for one year.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is under a divorce lawsuit as a marital relationship with the victim C.

1. No person who violates the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network (violation, etc. of Information and Communications Network) shall intrude into an information and communications network without legitimate authority

Nevertheless, on December 2015, the Defendant entered the victim’s ID and password acquired from the Defendant’s computer to the “Kakao Stockholm Stockholm” in order to verify the victim’s external appearance, at the Defendant’s residence, Jinju-si, 104 and 1901, and accessed the information and communications network without legitimate access from around that time to February 3, 2016, in order to verify the victim’s external appearance.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Protection of Communications Secrets shall record or listen to conversations between others that are not open to the public, unless it is governed by the Act on the Protection of Communications Secrets, criminal litigation or military court law;

Nevertheless, around May 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed a “callx” for the purpose of paragraph (1) by means of installing a “callx” on the victim’s cell phone located in the victim’s mobile phone located in the vicinity of the victim; (b) from around that time to June 14, 2015, the victim recorded about 360 conversations with others by using the victim’s mobile phone; and (c) again, around June 13, 2015, the victim listened to the recording file stored in the victim’s mobile phone in the victim’s mobile phone by directly hearing from the victim’s mobile phone on June 9, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1.Each investigation report (as to attachment of photographs);

arrow